Contemporary trend of the expiry of the criminal case Reconciliation in corruption crimes (comparative study)

Abstract

Abstract: The prevailing trend in the criminal law goes to thein admissibility of conciliation in the crimes of assaulting public money, and the political, economic and social conditions that Iraq and Egypt went through prompted the continuous demand to hold the perpetrators of these crimes accountable in a way that ensures justice in the face of the perpetrators of these crimes on the one hand and the state's recovery of its public money Stolen by a group of crimes of public money, and due to the difficulty of achieving these goals, the Egyptian legislator issued Law No. (16) for the year 2015 that permitted reconciliation between the state and the accused or convicted of public money crimes in Article (18 bis-b) of the Egyptian Criminal Procedure Law Likewise, the Iraqi legislator permitted indirect reconciliation with the accused in articles (3) and (4/tenth) of the General Amnesty Law No. (27) for the year 2016 which
stipulated the exclusion of perpetrators of embezzlement, theft of state funds and intentionally wasting public money from the General Amnesty Law unless They pay the sums arranged by them before their release as a way to reduce punishment by administering criminal cases outside the framework of traditional criminal procedures, as a result of the substantive and procedural legal issues  brought about by corruption cases, perhapsthe most prominent of which is the difficulty of recovering the assaulted public money.